Unlike Alcohol, its Tough to Set DUI Limits for Marijuana
Recent article by Ashley Halsey III of the Washington Post focusing on the issues surrounding limits for drivers who have consumed marijuana:
There is a legal limit for drunk driving, but when it comes to marijuana, new research shows it may be impossible to say just how high is too high to drive.
There's no breathalyzer for pot, and researchers say blood tests are useless when it comes to telling whether someone who has been smoking is fit to drive.
The question matters now that four states have made it legal for any adult to smoke marijuana, and more than 20 others have approved its use for medical reasons. In Washington, one of the first states to approve recreational marijuana use, a study released this week found that 17 percent of drivers involved in fatal crashes two years after marijuana was legalized had THC, the component that creates the high, in their system.
At least 20 states have approved laws on marijuana use by drivers. A dozen of them have made any use of the drug by those behind the wheel illegal; six others have set a legal limit similar to the .08 alcohol level, with any driver testing above it subject to a DUI conviction.
A report by researchers at the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety said there is no threshold that indicates when a marijuana smoker may be too impaired to drive.
'There is no reliable number that has any meaningful value in terms of predicting impairment,' said Jake Nelson, AAA's director of traffic safety and advocacy.
The AAA Foundation recommends doing away with setting legal limits for THC. Instead, it says each police department should put a cadre of officers through 72 hours of training, followed by field testing, to be certified as drug recognition experts (DRE).
If an officer suspected marijuana use, a DRE could be called in to conduct an hour-long series of tests, and if they provide confirmation, a blood test would follow.
'It shifts the burden of evidence from the prosecution to the defense,' Nelson said. 'If you can prove that you weren't [using pot], you can avoid conviction, but if you can't beat this case, then you're going to jail.'
Nelson says that since there is no threshold, some people who are not fit to drive will get off the hook if they are stopped or involved in a crash.
'People who are driving impaired are still going to crash,' he said.
But 'if you have a blood concentration of THC below whatever stated threshold it is in your state, essentially the courts will presume sobriety. The odds of getting convicted of impaired driving, even if you're all over the road, are slim to none because of that number. And because we know from the research that the number is meaningless, that there's no research that supports any stated threshold, so to have those laws on the books is bad news.'